Back to Resources
NEWS3 min readJune 23, 2025

Ethereum's Road to Decentralizing the Sequencer — 2025 Update

Most major L2s currently operate with a single sequencer — one entity controlling transaction ordering. Risks include potential censorship, sequencer MEV extraction, and single point of failure for liveness.

ClickMasters Team
Practical Guide
Expert Resource

Practical Takeaway

Most major L2s currently operate with a single sequencer — one entity controlling transaction ordering. Risks include potential censorship, sequencer MEV extraction, and single point of failure for liveness.

Full Resource

Most major L2s (Arbitrum, Optimism, Base) currently operate with a single sequencer — one entity controlling transaction ordering. Risks include potential censorship, sequencer MEV extraction, and single point of failure for liveness. Progress: Arbitrum's BOLD fraud proof enables permissionless validation; Optimism Superchain envisions shared sequencing; Espresso Systems and other third-party infrastructure offers decentralized sequencing as a service.

Most major L2s (Arbitrum, Optimism, Base) currently operate with a single sequencer — one entity controlling transaction ordering. Risks include potential censorship, sequencer MEV extraction, and single point of failure for liveness. Progress: Arbitrum's BOLD fraud proof enables permissionless validation; Optimism Superchain envisions shared sequencing; Espresso Systems and other third-party infrastructure offers decentralized sequencing as a service. Sequencer decentralization matters most for applications requiring strong censorship resistance — DeFi protocols, applications serving users in restrictive jurisdictions.

Ready to Build on L2?

Let's help you navigate the L2 landscape.

Keep Reading

Related Resources